29
Appreciation post: That old jeweler's loupe I picked up in Philly
I stopped by a tiny antique shop in South Philly last weekend and found a brass jeweler's loupe for $8. I've been using it to eyeball shutter blades and lens elements up close, and it actually shows me dust and oil spots way better than my cheap magnifying lamp ever did. Anyone here use a loupe instead of a scope for quick inspections?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
willowg8812d ago
Wait, you paid $8 for a brass loupe in Philly? That's such a steal. I snagged one at a flea market in Brooklyn a few years back for $12 and it's been a game changer for checking my gear. I use it to spot dust on sensor glass and even tiny scratches on lens coatings that I'd totally miss with the naked eye. It's way better than those cheap plastic magnifiers that just distort everything. Honestly, I find loupes less clunky than a full scope for quick checks, especially when I'm out shooting and don't want to haul extra stuff. So yeah, you're not alone in ditching the lamp for a loupe.
3
the_paul12d agoMost Upvoted
And here I thought I was being reckless with my eight bucks, but turns out I'm just a savvy investor in tiny magnifying tech. Nothing says "I take my dust specks seriously" like pulling out a brass loupe on the street like some Victorian watchmaker. At least if the photography thing tanks, I can pivot to inspecting rare coins or judging tiny beauty pageants.
9
murphy.tessa12d ago
Pulling out a brass loupe on the street like some Victorian watchmaker" is exactly the vibe I'm going for, honestly. It's not a phase, mom, it's a magnifying glass aesthetic. I love that you think of tiny beauty pageants as a backup career because I'm pretty sure my loupe has deemed my face an unacceptable mix of dust and scratches. Gotta respect the $8 investment though, that's basically the price of a sad avocado toast but with way more street cred.
0