F
2

I thought AI art was just a gimmick until I saw a piece win a local contest

A gallery in my town had a digital art contest last month, and the winner was a piece made with an AI tool called Midjourney. I was ready to write it off as cheating... but then I saw the process video. The artist spent over 80 hours doing in-painting, editing layers in Photoshop, and fixing weird AI hands. It wasn't just typing a prompt. It completely changed my view on what that tool can be. Has anyone else had their mind changed by seeing the actual work behind an AI-assisted piece?
4 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
4 Comments
susan_adams
What contest was it?
8
gray875
gray8752mo ago
Right? That process video is key. It shows it's more like a weird new paintbrush than a magic button. Makes you wonder how many other winners are actually hybrids.
5
owens.anthony
So like @gray875 said, how much editing makes it "real" art then?
2
the_terry
the_terry1mo agoMost Upvoted
80 hours of fixing AI mistakes just proves the tool is still broken out of the box, not that it's a legitimate artistic medium. Watching someone babysit bad anatomy and texture glitches in Photoshop is just damage control, not creation. The whole exercise feels like putting lipstick on a pig and calling it a new breed of livestock.
2