Seriously, is focusing on syllable count always ignoring the pain? Sometimes form is part of the analysis, you know. It might not be as dismissive as it seems.
Wyatt135's example of professors fixating on syllable count while overlooking pain reminds me of a broader shift in academic poetry circles. (I've seen this in journals where critiques prioritize form over feeling, almost as a defensive move against sentimentality.) This might stem from the late 20th-century pushback against confessional poetry, which now manifests as an overcorrection where technical prowess is valued above emotional resonance. So when structure eclipses expression, as in wyatt135's experience, the critique misses the poem's core purpose.