Loading…
8
While visiting family in Texas, I sat in on their school board debate over history books
The tension in the room was unreal, lol, and it's got me curious about our own curriculum fights. Have you ever seen a meeting like that in another place?
4 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In4 Comments
paulw536mo ago
What good are new books if teachers still avoid hard truths?
3
uma3296mo ago
In my hometown in Ohio, we had a three-hour school board meeting last year about adding a new African American history unit. I used to think these curriculum fights were just political noise, but listening to parents argue over specific pages changed my mind. They debated whether a textbook should call the Civil War a fight over states' rights or slavery first. A local teacher pointed out how our old books skipped almost all of Jim Crow, and a historian showed photos from our own town's past. It hit me that these tense talks decide what facts kids learn, not just who wins the argument.
1
david7556mo ago
Curriculum wars are real. What's the worst example you've seen of history being whitewashed? I remember a debate in Tennessee where they wanted to remove mentions of the KKK from middle school books. One parent said it was too upsetting for kids, but how do you learn from past mistakes if you hide them? My cousin's kid came home thinking civil rights just happened without a fight. When we only teach the clean version, kids don't get why things are still messed up. Does that set them up to repeat old errors?
1
david_cooper136mo ago
That bit about your town's three hour meeting deciding whether to call the Civil War about states' rights first really gets me. @david755 is right that hiding the KKK is bad, but that phrasing fight feels sneakier. It makes me wonder, after those long meetings, what actually changes in the classroom? Do teachers get new books, or just a list of words to avoid? Because if it's just swapping some terms, kids are still getting the whitewashed version, just with cleaner words.
4