Loading…
15
I always kept equity tight, but a hiring fail shifted my view.
In my experience, I felt keeping most equity was best for control. After a key hire turned us down, I offered a bigger slice and they joined right away. Your mileage may vary, but it showed me sharing can pull in top people. Take this with a grain of salt, and I'd like to hear how others balance equity early on.
4 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In4 Comments
the_aaron6mo ago
Yeah, and what @rodriguez.jana said about the trade-off really hits home. It reminds me of stuff like carpooling, you know? You could drive alone and have full control of the radio, but sometimes you gotta give up a seat and let someone pick the music if you want help with gas and the drive. That hire saying no was your moment of seeing an empty passenger seat. Sharing a real piece of the future proves you see them as a driver, not just a passenger. It's a basic lesson that giving up some thing now can get you a better ride later.
10
rodriguez.jana6mo ago
That's a tough lesson to learn, but it makes total sense... giving up some control feels scary, but if it gets the right person in the door, it's worth it. Sounds like you found the real trade-off between keeping a tight grip and actually building the team you need.
5
chen.cole6mo ago
Lol, the carpool thing is so true. It's like you're white-knuckling the steering wheel while someone else is begging to play their trash playlist. But for real, that fear of letting go is what kills so many startups. You end up driving alone forever just because you can't stand the idea of someone else picking the music. And then you wonder why you're burned out and going nowhere fast. Giving up that control isn't just about being nice, it's about not being dumb.
5
milah766mo ago
Yeah, the "tight grip" thing was my old rule too. Watching that offer work changed my mind fast, sharing really does build the team.
4