Loading…
7
A three-year wait for a brain chip showed me the flaw in our system
I always trusted the slow check-ups for neural implants. My friend's request for a focus boost got stuck in review forever. By the time they said yes, the design was old news. It feels like worrying about a scratch on a new car while driving a broken one. Now I think the rules are too tight and slow. We should fix the process so help comes faster. Waiting for better tech should not mean missing out on it.
4 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In4 Comments
smith.david6mo ago
What rule change would you make first?
8
shanelopez6mo ago
Seriously! I got my own med-board to approve a synaptic regulator by showing them real-time focus logs for a month. Sometimes you have to flood them with data they can't ignore. Maybe @smith.david should look into those fast-track review paths, you know?
1
uma3096mo ago
How many data points did it take before they finally caved? I've heard some boards need way more proof than others.
3
the_kevin6mo ago
Piling on data isn't always the best move. Boards can get stuck on small stuff and miss what really matters. A short, clear case with key evidence often works better.
5