Unpopular opinion: The real sleuthing happens in dusty record rooms, not on TV
I taught myself to read microfilm for a town mystery that bugged me. A marriage license from 1975 tied two families together in a way that changed everything.
But those old records have details digital scans often miss. Like handwritten corrections or personal notes in the margins. You can't replace the context of the original paper.
Taraross saying digital clues solve things dusty records never could is funny. Sure, a database can find a name fast, but can it give you that weird paper cut from a 100-year-old ledger? Digital misses the whole vibe of touching history. Plus, those old records have mistakes that only make sense when you see the coffee stain next to them. It's like streaming vs vinyl, one is easy but the other has soul.